Continuing on the subject of punishment, I'm going to write briefly on whether a slave should or should not be bound for punishment.
It is common to have the slave bound for punishment as a punishment is meant to be hard and intense. Hence, tieing up the slave would ensure the slave would have no means of escape from this ordeal until his Master is done.
On the other hand, I find it very interesting also to have punishment administered without having to tie up the slave. The slave will have to maintain the punishment position throughout and failure to keep the position, will incur more punishment. In this situation, a slave will most certainly earn more punishment due to his initial punishment.
Anyone would like to comment?
My experience is that it is very hot to make a slave or boy stay in certain positions for punishment. One of my favorites is having stand naked, legs spread about three feet from a wall. He then leans forward and places his palms on the wall. Then its up on tiptoes for the whipping. If the palms leave the wall or he leaves the tip toe position there are consequences. Still for the most severe real punishment, he should be tied.
ReplyDeleteI quite like either but I find making the slave keep his position more submissive as it shows he accepts it as part of his role. Besides, it's an excuse for punishment if he can't keep it...
ReplyDelete